ThaiNGO

Objectives

Indicators

Methodology

Sample size and participants

Goal

Thai government adopts ‘Safe and Resilient School’, upscaling from initiative of Chiang Rai Safe School Model, into public policy agenda and strategy by 2022.

G.a DDPM and OBEC integrated comprehensive school safety framework into their policies, strategies or development plans

Qualitative: KII with government actors

1 DDPM staff and 1 OBEC staff

OR TSSN representative

Outcome 1

Enhanced capacities of local schools across ESAOs in Chiang Rai adopt Safe School practices and institutionalize CSSF into educational curriculum

1a. # of schools that implement school safety practices with at least 80% compliance of minimum standard

Qualitative: KII with government actors

4 ESAO staffs

1b. # of education service area offices institutionalize comprehensive school safety framework into their planning and budgeting process

Qualitative: KII with government actors

4 ESAO staffs

Output 1.1

Teachers, education staffs and DRR practitioners gained practical knowledge and skills on Safe School Framework, multi-risk assessment, and disaster and climate change educational curriculum development

1.1a. # of teachers, educational staffs and DRR practioners with knowledge and skills on DRR an School Safety

Quantitative: questionnaire with teachers and education staffs

170 teachers

1.1b. # of formal/informal disaster and resilience education curriculums developed by schools.

Qualitative: KII with school principals

8 school principals

1.1c. # of schools conducted multi-risk assessments with participation of children

Qualitative: KII with government actors

4 ESAO staffs

Output 1.2

Children and youth as champion of change in DRR and resilience meaningfully engaged in planning and monitoring process on school safety and voiced out their needs in policy dialogues, public forum and campaigns.

1.2a. # of children and youth reported on increase level of leadership capacity

Interactive questions with primary school student

370 children

1.2b. # of children and youth who report on increase level of participating in dialogues, public forums and campaign related to DRR and CCA.

Interactive questions with primary school student

370 children

Output 1.3

Provide technical support/consultation for targeted schools and ESAOs to monitor and improve Safe and Resilient School implementation

1.3a. # schools that has MEL mechanism for comprehensive school safety framework in-place.

Qualitative: KII with government actors

4 ESAO staffs

1.3b. % of issues/cases related to school safety brought forward by children are responded by schools and ESAOs

Qualitative: Focus group discussion – student committee

40 students

Outcome 2

School Safety certification scheme improved collaboration and quality of Safe and Resilient School initiatives among existing and new Safe School practitioners in Thailand.

2a. % of targeted schools accredited as Safe School by relevant certifying bodies.

Qualitative: KII with government actors

4 ESAO staffs

2b. # of new collaborations among school safety practitioners established and maintained to support children in schools.

Quantitative: questionnaire with teachers and education staffs

170 teachers

Output 2.1

Certification scheme and accrediting system developed for Safe and Resilient School based on existing minimum standard in order to scale out to new ESAOs areas.

2.1a. Children’s rights, gender and disability inclusiveness incorporated in School Safety certification scheme

Qualitative: KII with government actors

4 ESAO staffs

Output 2.2

New collaborations and initiatives among local safe and resilience school practitioners are developed and implemented in new ESAO areas to mitigate disaster risks and climate change.

2.2a. # of student groups / young people organizations that implement their own or joint action aiming at gender equality and inclusiveness in relation to school safety

Qualitative: Focus group discussion – student committee

40 students

2.2b. # of media products are developed to communicate and showcase school and DRR good practices with children participation and contribution.

Qualitative: Focus group discussion – student committee

40 students

Outcome 3:

New or improved participatory mechanism on Safe and Resilience School are adopted by Thai governments to incorporate children’s needs into policy decision making, planning and monitoring of CSSF.

3.a. # of new/improved mechanism that children and youth are able to meaningfully engage in policy decision making, planning and monitoring on CSSF adopted by Thai government agencies.

Qualitative: KII with government actors

1 DDPM staff and 1 OBEC staff

OR TSSN representative

Output 3.1:

Youth-led action campaigns and public forum (e.g DRR Day, IDG, and Children's Day) are organized to influence public opinions and the governments on school safety at sub-national and national level

3.1a # of sub-national and national level campaign organized to promote school safety and DRR education.

Qualitative: KII with government actors

4 ESAO staffs

1 DDPM staff and 1 OBEC staff

3.1b # of groups / organizations who use social media effectively in their collective actions and campaigns.

Qualitative: Focus group discussion – student committee

40 students

Output 3.2:

Evidence-based policy research and case study (through endorsement by the Gov’t) are conducted to improve existing DRR and education policy framework to incorporate child-led Safe and Resilient School approach.

3.2a # of policy research or case study endorsed by the government units which address gender equality and inclusiveness in school safety.

Qualitative: KII with government actors

1 DDPM staff and 1 OBEC staff

OR TSSN representative

Area

District

Number of schools involved in the project

Participant schools for KAP

ESAO CRI Zone 1

Muang, Wiang Chai and Wiang Chiang Rung

10

2

ESAO CRI Zone 2

Mae Suay and Pan

15

2

ESAO CRI Zone 3

Maechan and Maefaluang

15

2

ESAO CRI Zone 4

Teung, Wiang Kaen and Chiang Khong

10

2

50

8

Activity

Time

Days of Work

Responsible

Individuals Involved

Tendering

1 June 2022

To

14 June 2022

14 days

Procurement

MERL, Project team, Procurement

Background Checks and Contracting;

Inception Call/ Inception Workshop

15 June 2022

To

17 June 2022

3 days

Procurement

CD, Procurement, Project team

Submission of Inception Report

18 June 2022

1 day

Consultant

MERL, Gender Specialist, Project team

Preparations for Data Collection

Develop tools

19 June 2022

To 23 June 2022

5 days

Consultant

MERL, Gender Specialist, Project team

1. Tool translation

24 June 2022

1 days

Consultant

MERL, Gender Specialist, Project team

2. Field piloting

25 June 2022

To 27 June 2022

3 days

Consultant

Consultant

3. Tools finalisation

28 June 2022

1 days

Consultant

Project team

4. Enumerator training

29 June 2022

1 day

Consultant

Consultant

5. Data Collection

30 June 2022

To 9 July 2022

10 days

Consultant

Consultant

Data Entry and Cleaning

10 July 2022

To 15 July 2022

5 days

Consultant

Consultant

Data Analysis

16 July 2022

To 20 July 2022

5 days

Consultant

Consultant

Validation of findings with key stakeholders and respondents & feedback incorporation

21 July 2022

To 25 July 2022

5 days

Consultant

Consultant

Submission of Draft

26 July 2022

1 day

Consultant

MERL, Gender Specialist, Project team

Submission of Final Report

27 July 2022

1 day

Consultant

MERL, Gender Specialist, Project team

Submission of Other Deliverables

28 July 2022

To 30 July 2022

3 day

Consultant

Project team

Management Response and Action Plan

End of

August 2022

Project team

CD, Project team

Deliverables 

Format 

Deadline