Development News and Information Sources
Plan International
Terms of Reference for
Light Midline Learning and Adjustment Exercise Consultant
1. Introduction
Plan International is an international child and youth development organisation dedicated to promoting the realisation of children and young people’s rights, especially girls’ rights, in both development and humanitarian settings. We strive to advance children’s rights and girls' equality worldwide. As an independent development and humanitarian organisation, we work alongside children, young people, our supporters and partners to tackle the root causes of the challenges facing girls and all vulnerable children. We support children’s rights from birth until they reach adulthood and enable children to prepare for and respond to crises and adversity. We drive changes in practice and policy at local, national and global levels using our reach, experience and knowledge. For over 80 years, we have been building powerful partnerships for children, and we are active in over 75 countries.
2. Project Background
GIRLS without Fears, funded by the European Union, collaborated under partnership with Internet Foundation for the Development of Thailand, has the Overall Objective (OO) to promote the fulfilment of Thai children and youth’s digital rights in inclusive, safe and gender/age-responsive online spaces in line with the UN Child Rights Convention. The specific objective is to strengthen systems and frameworks that promote safe and equitable engagement of Thai children and youth in online spaces in 5 provinces in Thailand, namely Chiang Rai, Khon Kaen, Bangkok, Ratchaburi, and Phuket. This objective takes a systemic and human rights-based approach by bringing together rights holders and duty bearers to address a common goal that impacts society and the future of Thailand’s new generation. It supports Thailand’s governance and development process, respecting human rights and democratic principles, with a view to the achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).
At the current stage of implementation, the project has rolled out key interventions, including capacity strengthening for teachers and youth, and the establishment of multi-stakeholder Provincial Working Groups. As the project reaches its midpoint, there is a need to conduct a light Midterm Learning and Adjustment Exercise to assess implementation progress, capture emerging evidence of change, identify key challenges, and generate practical recommendations. The review will support adaptive management and help ensure that the project remains responsive, effective, and aligned with its intended outcomes for the remaining implementation period.
3. Objective of the TOR
The objective of this consultancy is to collect data for a midterm learning review study of the GIRLS Without Fear Project. The main purpose is to generate practical evidence on implementation progress, emerging changes, challenges, enabling factors, and lessons learned. The review will use selected project indicators as guiding areas of inquiry, while recognising that findings will be qualitative, contextual, and not statistically representative. Plan International, and Why I Why Foundation are the main users of the midline finding to inform adaptive planning, implementation strategies, and outcome target review for the remaining project period.
The consultant is required to confirm and propose a methodology (including validation and analysis method) and tailored data collection tools for each respondent group (e.g., Provincial Working Groups: PWGs, teachers, and youth), and group-specific probes, with integration of gender-responsive and inclusive questions.
4. Purpose:
The purpose of the light midterm learning and adjustment exercise is:
5. Scope of Work (what to assess)
What to assess, key themes/interventions:
Key learning themes questions:
1. Implementation progress
1.1 Are key activities happening/progressing as planned?
1.2 What is delayed and blocking (challenges) and what should be done to mitigate these challenges?
2. Quality and effectiveness of key interventions
2.1 Are trainings actually building capacity?
2.2 Are PWGs functioning as coordination bodies?
2.3 Gender and safeguarding considerations
3. Early outcome (signals not impact) use existing evidence:
3.1 What early changes are visible?
3.2 Are stakeholders applying what they have learned?
4. Systems change signals (this one is crucial)
a. Are structures becoming self-sustaining?
b. Is the project strengthening systems or just delivering activities?
5. adaptive needs, what we should change in the coming period.
a. What should be scaled/dropped/redesigned
b. Lessons Learned
6. Methodology
The consultant is required to submit an Inception Note for approval, outlining the proposed methodology (including validation and analysis methods), and to develop tailored data collection tools for each respondent group (e.g., provincial working groups, teachers, and youth), with group‑specific probes and the integration of gender‑responsive and inclusive questions.
1. Desk review: narrative reports, training data, learning reports, monitoring data. Output: map progress vs logframe, identify gaps and trends.
2. 8-10 short semi-structured KIIs with 2 teachers, 2 youth leaders, 1-2 PWG members, 2-3 duty bearers (social workers/parents) and 2 project staff. The scope of the interview will be around practical experiences, what changed, what is not working, to capture system-level insights, coordination mechanisms, and policy influence (if applicable at this stage), and understand implementation challenges and enabling factors
3. One quick reflection workshop with project staff and partners
3.1 Invite the project team and selected partners
3.2 [2-3] hours facilitated session by the consultant on what worked, what didn’t, lessons learned, and what we should change.
4. Validate with the team and cross-check the interview results with desk finding
5. Data analysis approach:
5.1 Relevance
5.2 Effectiveness (early stage)
5.3 Efficiency
5.4 Sustainability (early signals)
5.5 Cross-cutting: good practices, challenges, gender and safeguarding considerations.
7. Sampling Strategy and Coverage
The sample strategy will be purposive sampling, where the criteria for beneficiaries could be:
|
Target group |
Method |
Number of participants |
|
Provincial Working Groups (PWGs) |
KII 30-45 min semi-structured & Case study |
2 |
|
Teachers participated in ToT |
KII or Simple scoring & Case study |
2 |
|
Youth participated in ToT |
KII or Simple scoring & Case study |
2 |
|
Duty barriers participated in the seminar |
KII or Simple scoring |
2 |
|
Project Staff (Plan TH & WhyIWhy) |
Light Reflection Workshop |
2 |
8. Data Collection Methods
The consultant is required to develop separate data-collection tools for each respondent group, comprising core standardised questions and tailored probes. The tools must incorporate gender‑responsive and inclusive questioning approaches to ensure equitable representation of experiences and perspectives.
1. Interview guide KII (example)
2. Simple scoring methodology
Use quick scoring (1-5) for:
3. Case stories
Collect 2-3 short examples like:
The consultant may conduct data collection through online platforms (e.g., Zoom or other virtual meeting tools), as appropriate and agreed with Plan International Thailand
9. Report Development
The consultant should produce a short learning report as the final deliverable on:
10. Deliverables/output and Schedule
The timeline of this consultancy is 6 weeks after the signing of the contract. The consultant will submit the following as outputs
|
Deliverables/Output |
Details |
Schedule |
|
1. Contracting the Consultant |
Signing of contract and initial briefing with PIT |
Week 1 |
|
2. Desk Review & Inception Note |
Review of relevant project documents, development of an inception note (3-5 pages) including methodology, tools, and a detailed work plan |
Week 1-2 (5-7 days) |
|
3. KII Interview |
Conduct KII Interview across provinces/target groups of respondents |
Week 2-3 (5-7 days) |
|
4. Light Reflection Workshop |
With PIT & Why I Why Foundation for validating & cross-checking the interview |
Week 3 (1-2 days) |
|
5. Workshop inputs |
Session inputs and discussions |
Week 3-4 (1-2 days) |
|
6. Analysis and reporting |
Thematic analysis of qualitative data; preparation and submission of draft Light Midterm Learning and Adjustment Exercise Report |
Week 4-5 (5-7 days) |
|
7. Final Report Submission |
Submission of final report |
Week 6 (3-5 days) |
11. Supervision and Support
The consultant will report to Plan International Thailand’s MERL Manager, GIRLS Without Fear Project Manager, and will work in collaboration with the implementing partner (Why I Why Foundation).
12. Ethical and Safeguarding
The consultant must conduct the Midterm Learning Review in line with ethical research standards and Plan International’s Child and Youth Safeguarding Policy and Code of Conduct, with particular attention to adolescents and young people.
Participation must be voluntary, with informed consent obtained from all participants, and parental/guardian consent and youth assent required for those under 18. The consultant must apply age-appropriate, gender-sensitive, and youth-friendly approaches throughout.
Prior to data collection, the consultant must submit:
The consultant must ensure confidentiality, secure data handling, and a ‘do no harm’ approach, and report any safeguarding concerns through Plan International Thailand’s mechanisms.
13. Quality Assurance
The consultant must apply a clear and robust methodology, using appropriate data collection tools, and ensuring consistency across all stages of the review.
All outputs will be subject to review and feedback from Plan International Thailand, and the consultant is required to revise deliverables accordingly. Data triangulation across different sources should be applied to strengthen the validity of findings.
The final report should be evidence-based, clearly structured, and provide practical, actionable recommendations aligned with the project’s objectives.
14. Qualifications
The applicant should have the following qualifications:
15. Respondents are asked to provide
We invite interested consultants to submit the following application documents:
All applications received by the submission date will be reviewed by a selection committee, based on predetermined objective criteria. Upon selection, the consultant/agency will be invited for a discussion and requested to submit a detailed inception note (described in section 10 of this TOR) prior to the start of the assignment.
The application can be sent electronically through the email: Thailand.procurement@plan-international.org with the subject “Light Midline Learning and Adjustment Exercise Consultant” within 13 July 2026.
Only applicants with complete documents, including samples of previous works, will go through the selection process.
Contact : Thailand.procurement@plan-international.org